More than 700 architects and engineers have joined call for new investigation, faulting official collapse reports By Gregg Roberts and AE911Truth Staff Source: Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth The facts are in. The evidence is conclusive. These experts lay it all out. For Some, the Doubts Began Early "Something is wrong with this picture," thought Nathan Lomba, as he watched replays of the Twin Tower collapses on television on September 11, 2001. A licensed structural engineer trained in buildings' responses to stress, Lomba saw more on the screen than you or I. He puzzled, "How did the structures collapse in near-symmetrical fashion when the damage was clearly not symmetrical?" Lomba was hardly alone in his discomfort. Most structural engineers were surprised when the towers fell. They mainly kept their misgivings to themselves, though, as Scientific American and the Journal of Engineering Mechanics, BBC, the History Channel and government agencies such as FEMA and NIST offered varying and often imaginative theories to explain how fires brought the towers down. This entire article is available on PDF at: http://www.ae911truth.org/info/64 Continue Reading








Nov 19-20, Occupy Building 7
Michael Moore Supports a New 9/11 Investigation
New Book By David Ray Griffin
Lupe Fiasco Talks 9/11 Conspiracy at New York Protest
Roseanne Barr on 9/11: “We Know”
NEW 9/11 Explosive Documentary Film: The Experts Speak Out
France: 58% Doubt the Official 9/11 Version, Only 14% Know About Building 7


