Online Shopping Can Change the World

Niels Harrit

Face to Face with Niels Harrit

Dr. Niels Harrit is a retired associate professor of chemistry at the University of Copenhagen and one among an international team of scientists who published a paper in The Open Chemical Physics Journal on the discovery of nano-thermite in the dust from the World Trade Center collapses on September 11, 2001. He has recently finished a lecture tour of Canadian universities, where he spoke on the subject.

In this interview on the cable program Face to Face with Jack Etkin, Dr. Harrit discusses this finding and its implications. Dr. Harrit notes that World Trade Center building 7 (WTC 7), a 47-story steel-framed skyscraper that was not hit by one of the planes on 9/11, collapsed symmetrically into its own footprint, and that the official explanation for this is that it was due to fire. However, the finding of nano-thermite in the dust, along with other available evidence, leads inescapably to another conclusion. “There is no doubt that this building was taken down in a controlled demolition,” says Dr. Harrit. “I consider this to be [a] mainstream scientific conclusion. There’s no way around this conclusion. There are so many observations that are only compatible with a controlled demolition.”

“Science is based on observation and experience,” says Dr. Harrit in the interview. Point out that it had never occurred before 9/11, he says, “A steel framed high rise simply does not collapse due to fire.”

Among the other evidence is the observation that WTC 7 fell at the acceleration of gravity, or free-fall acceleration. Fire, says Dr. Harrit, cannot do that to a building. “All of these columns had to be cut at the same time for this phenomenon to happen,” he says.

Discussing the relevance and importance of the conclusion that the three World Trade Center towers were destroyed in a controlled demolition, Dr. Harrit says, “I think what happened on September 11, 2001 is the most important event to our generation, and for our children…. And the consequences of this event should be obvious to everyone. But it’s not. But it’s happening at such a slow pace that people maybe do not connect the dots.”


Your Comments

  • Ripple-effect

    IF?  There is no IF!

  • Ripple-effect

    My take is that there was a botched, intended hit on Building 7.  Having failed, the powers that be resorted to their Plan B and used their scientific potion to kill the papers in #7 which implicated the Bush administration of having prior knowledge of the heart-wrenching results.

  • Elandalussii

    “And the consequences of this event should be obvious to everyone. But it’s not. But it’s happening at such a slow pace that people maybe do not connect the dots.”

    Indeed! It seems like people are in a controlled hypnosis … Amazing!!! This is the evidence of the power of main stream media to control our mind. Have a look at the wonderful book “Bug Jack Barron” …

  • adrian ingate

    nothing to do with a massive aeroplane crashing into it then??

    • Steve 9/11

      No Adrian. “nothing to do with a massive aeroplane crashing into it then??”

      I guess you didn’t watch the interview — or read the “official” reports of FEMA, the 9/11 Commission and NIST, ALL which stated the reason the towers fell was because of “OFFICE FIRES”.
      So no. It wasn’t because of “massive aeroplanes crashing into it then”. (Whatever the fuck that means….) And, no “aeroplanes” hit Building 7, so that leaves your silly little shit-ass, smirking hypothesis to die on the ground.

      Look, we don’t care what you THINK, “adrian ingate”. That’s all in your withered, exceptionistic, solipsistic little pea-mind. If you want to think that two jetliners can bring down three buildings straight down into their own footprints, then that’s your disorder.

      What the rest of us care about is the truth and that requires more than stroking a black Les Paul in your icon photo. (Yeah, you look fucking cool… but we don’t care about cool here. Really, we don’t.)

      One more thing: These buildings were designed to handle multiple airplane impacts. That is how and why buildings of that height get their certification from their respective city councils. In the case of Manhattan, there is enormous aircraft traffic, thousands of high-rises and there are exquisite building laws that deal with said air traffic and complementary air-traffic laws.

      For Christ’s sake. Get educated before making any further posts. Better yet, switch to a “Strat” — that might make you appear smarter… or appear cooler. (I seriously doubt it.)

      Unless you were just being facetious in which case you can fuck yourself for being so goddamn cheeky.

      • adrian ingate

        so i was right?
        you need to get out more my friend.

    • Jasm

      wrong building, try again

Donate any amount to support our work
911 Video of the week
See all recent news »


ArabicChinese (Simplified)DanishEnglishFinnishFrenchGermanGreekIrishItalianJapaneseNorwegianPolishPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishTurkish

9-11 Truth Movement

Professional Organizations

9-11 Truth News Website and Activist Organizations or Individuals

9-11 First Responders Support

Worldwide 9-11 Groups

United States










New Zealand



United Kingdom