The message is clear, We are under attack, but by who? And for what? Follow the money trail, the debt, the money supply, where and to who does it lead from whom and how? Who made out like bandits?

Rhetoric and reality are NOT the same. 9/11 was a violent overthrow of our rights, our way of life. It showed us the value of our life. At core, tax money was taken, lives were taken, jobs were taken, rights were taken. The implications, one should look at the common sense implications, perhaps in a way Thomas Paine did in the American Revolution. Is your life so much better? And what of the future? When a real estate mortgage is more like an installment sale contract, you pay for 10 years, then loose it all. Who got the value of your labor, your life, your time in all of this? Where is the security in this? So who owns you as the purchasing power of your labor sinks? Are you homeless yet? Have you been excluded from work? Did your job become an export? Why is the money being printed in such huge quantities but distributed to banks, even foreign banks without any consent of the governed?

“Hey, what’s that sound? Everybody look what’s going down?”

A sequel where a myth of a 100% lame group of “a bunch of regular dudes who were pissed off at capitalism brought buildings down” is created to program assent to a FUTURE myth.

The future myth being that the mythical “al qaeda” brought down the towers, rather than a tightly coordinated, state-sponsored Fifth Column that happens to also have total control over Comedy Central and Hollywood movies and CNN as well as the rest of the news shills.

Stephen Colbert is a tragic case: TALENT, in capitalism, is sold to the HIGHEST BIDDER. Which in this case are the massive moneybags of a nation that OUGHT to be GRATEFUL to the USA, but instead sees the USA as a “force multiplier” for its own Nefarious Interests.

The USA is PWNED. There is a nation – actually, they are a good people in general, but their crust of evil leaders is who I am referring to – that has surrounded the institutions of American democracy and American mass media (along with obvious inroads into the other branches of government etc). This nation has a LONG TRADITION of BEING CAUGHT SPYING HERE in the USA.

Background: According to the official explanation, al Qaeda personnel spent a long time, perhaps several years, planning the operation to simultaneously hijack several commercial airliners and slam them into national landmarks in broad daylight. The four landmarks chosen were the Pentagon, both World Trade Center towers and one other, possibly the Capitol or the White House. All these targets are on the East Coast, in the middle of the most heavily secured and strictly monitored air space on the planet. This part of the country is also home to numerous US Air Force and Air National Guard bases over (or near) which the hijackers would have to take their commandeered flights to reach their targets. Since, according to the government, the operation was “meticulously planned down to the last detail”, the big “fly in the ointment” regarding the hijackers’ ultimate success or failure would have been their acute awareness that the US air force had a 100% track record in promptly and effectively challenging flights which had gone astray, averaging one interception every 5 days. The hijackers thus would have *known* very well, that to hit their targets before the USAF arrived, they would have to hijack each plane very close to the target, and fly straight there at maximum speed… that is, if the air defenses functioned at their unblemished efficiency.

So, what did the alleged hijackers do? In all four instances on 9/11, they flew long and roundabout routes to reach their targets once the planes were under their control. In the cases of Flights UA93 and AA77, they took their planes as far as the Ohio and Kentucky borders, then turned back and traversed heavily monitored and policed airspace for lengthy periods of time. In all four alleged hijacking events, if normal interception procedures had been followed, the planes would not have reached their targets unchallenged.

My question is not so much “why were the flights not challenged?”, but rather this: (A) “Why did the alleged hijackers elect to fly long and indirect routes to their eventual targets… a tactic which they knew would have guaranteed that the failure of their missions? ….and by extension: (B) How did they know that they would not be challenged according to normal procedure?

I can answer your comment about my letter only. As I have mentioned above in another comment, we, at world911truth.org (ae911truth has nothing to do with the challenge), have decided to use satire. Satire is the very language that the Stephen Colbert character, the egomaniac and volatile false news anchor uses in the Colbert Report (he would call himself just that). He has called people so many names it would be impossible to list them all here. He does that in a very funny way and I wouldn’t want him to change one bit. I am absolutely confident that Colbert won’t be hurt by this letter. All to the contrary.

It’s true that some people didn’t understand the nature of our call to Colbert, but most did. And trust me, if Colbert wants someone on his show, he won’t hesitate to challenge him this way if he thinks about it. We’re speaking his language and now the ball is in his court. Had we been very serious, we wouldn’t have had 10% of the reactions this challenge has created so far. I hope this clarifies our intention. I invite you to watch Colbert’s show to understand who he really is.

When Richard Gage goes on The Colbert Report, he will do justice to the 1,100+ professionals supporting him and Colbert will do justice to himself and to a huge portion of his “nation” by showing us all that he isn’t afraid to invite someone like Mr. Gage onto his show.

I think the letter will go straight in the bin.