Just days after September 11, 2001, the Environmental Protection Agency assured the public that there should be no concern about any health hazards associated with exposure to smoke and debris in lower Manhattan.
Now many of the first-responders who risked their lives within that toxic chemical soup are seriously ill or dying. Now many of the first-responders who risked their lives within that toxic chemical soup are seriously ill or dying. This disturbing documentary asks whether the EPA’s pronouncement was based on science or politics.
Filmmaker Heidi Dehncke-Fisher and producer Bruce Kennedy reveal how 9/11′s latest victims are America’s forgotten heroes.
In our new series of documentary films that go beyond the direct topic of 9/11, we introduce to you one of the best Robert Greenwald film, OUTFOXED: Rupert Murdoch’s War On Journalism.
This film will show you how media empires and their popular channels (CNN, MSNBC, ABC, FOX, and all the others) can be used to shape opinions, to control a debate and even to influence a population into wars. This film also unveils some of the most obvious propaganda techniques these media use in order to bring about subjective points of views instead of real objective work.
You will never see Fox News and their big “pundits” the same way again after watching OUTFOXED. And you will understand some of the reasons why we often hit hard on the frustrating work of the media regarding their coverage of the 9/11 Truth Movement.
With four corporations owning all major media outlets, objective information seems impossible.
Independent media and real investigative journalism are giant keys to a free and open society. Those who own the media and kill these principles should not be trusted. We hope you will stop encouraging the giant corporations that are now in control and visit the emerging independent news agencies on the Internet more often. The strongest message we can send to these giant corporations that shape and often create the News is to stop buying their products.
World911Truth is releasing a new series of documentaries for everyone to watch online. These selected documentaries will go beyond the direct topic of 9/11 but will still be related to that tragic day.
Our first pick is one of the best documentary made about the Iraq war: No End In Sight.
This important film has won several awards including best documentary/non-fiction film in Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco, Toronto and more. It also received a nomination for best documentary at the 2008 Oscars and won the Special Jury Prize at the Sundance Festival.
Synopsis
The first film of its kind to chronicle the reasons behind Iraq’s descent into guerrilla war, warlord rule, criminality and anarchy, NO END IN SIGHT is a jaw-dropping, insider’s tale of wholesale incompetence, recklessness and venality. Based on over 200 hours of footage, the film provides a candid retelling of the events following the fall of Baghdad in 2003 by high ranking officials such as former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, Ambassador Barbara Bodine (in charge of Baghdad during the Spring of 2003), Lawrence Wilkerson, former Chief of Staff to Colin Powell, and General Jay Garner (in charge of the occupation of Iraq through May 2003) as well as Iraqi civilians, American soldiers, and prominent analysts.
Hypothesis: New Documentary on Steven Jones (trailer)
The trailer for Hypothesis — a documentary short about Dr. Steven Jones and his 9/11 research.
The film tells Dr. Jones’ story in his own words and reflects the explosive controversy that ensued which resulted in everything from threats, bribery, and academic suspension.
What started as a mere hypothesis became so much more.
There is no official release date yet for this new documentary film by Brett Smith, but it is coming soon, so stay tuned!
During his lecture on May 1st, 2010 in Walkerton Ontario, Dr. David Ray Griffin challenged Canadians and the Canadian 9/11 Truth Movement to unite and demand a Canadian investigation into 9/11.
Dr. Griffin will be speaking at the University of Toronto on May 2nd and at the Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM) on May 3rd. Richard Gage, AIA, founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth will be joining Dr. Griffin on stage for these two nights.
Would you like to know what the French “spies” think of Al Qaeda? Hold-on tight, the masks are about to fall.
Note: The DGSE is the French equivalent of USA’s CIA or UK’s MI6.
During a round-table discussion at the French Senate January 29, 2010, on the topic of “Where are we at with Al Qaeda?”, Alain Chouet — former head of the Security Intelligence Service of the DGSE (Directorate-General for External Security: the French equivalent of the CIA or MI6) — demystified the concept of “Al Qaeda” and denounced the inappropriate responses and other instrumentalizations by the West, without however deflating the dangers of Islamic extremism.
The video below has been subtitled into English (thanks to ReOpen911.info) and edited to include the best parts of Alain Chouet’s passionate discourse containing no stonewalling or political doublespeak, placing itself light-years ahead of the official discourse about September 11th and “the nebulous Al Qaeda” that the mainstream media have been reporting for far too long.
Alain Chouet: “Al Qaeda Dead Since 2002″
Transcript
I’m Alain Chouet. For those who aren’t familiar with the internal organization of Intelligence Services, notably the French Intelligence Services, the Security and Information Services is charged with the collection of information and the implementation of active overseas measures in terms of counter-criminality, counter-espionage, counter-proliferation and counter-terrorism.
As with so many of my colleagues from around the world, I feel that on the basis of key information gathered, that ‘Al Qaeda’ died as a functioning force in the rat caves of Tora-Bora in 2002.
The Pakistani Intelligence Services, from 2003 to 2008, then happily offered us what was left in exchange for various indulgences.
Of the 400 active members of the organization which existed in 2001, as described in Marc Sageman’s excellent book, “Understanding Terror Networks” less than 50 henchmen (apart from Osama Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawaihri), who have no functional competence were able to escate and dissapear into remote regions, leading percarious lives, with primitive means of communication.
It’s not in this way that you can run a globaly coordinated network of political violence. Besides, it seems clear that none of the perpetrators of the post-9/11 terrorist attacks (London, Madrid, Casablanca, Djerba, Charm-el-Sheikh, Bali, Bombay, etc.) had any contact with the organization.
As for the more or less offbeat claims of responsability, occasionally articulated by Bin Laden or Zawahiri, supposing we can actually authenticate them, it doesn’t implicate any operational, organisational or functional link between these terrorists and the remains of the organisation.
However, I’m compelled to establish like everyone, that to keep invoking Al Qaeda as the source of everything, whenever a Muslim commits an act of violence, or a Muslim finds themselves in the wrong place at the wrong time (like with the AZF factory near Toulouse), or even when Muslims aren’t involved at all (like with the Anthrax attacks in the US), a certain number of reductivist members of the media, as well as some so-called side-experts, and others from the Atlantic have ended up not just reviving Al Qaeda, but transforming it into a kind of Amédée from the author Eugène Ionesco, a corpse which continually grows and overshadows reality, and which we don’t know how to get rid of it.
The dogmatic obsinacy of the West in invoking the mythical Al Qaeda (that has been characterised as a superterrorist not because of what it did, but because it attacked a superpower), has quickly had 2 pernicious effects.
1st effect: every violent protester in the Muslim world, either political or common-law, regardless of their motivation, quickly understood that he should claim to be from Al Qaeda so as to be taken seriously, so as to cover his actions in a legitimacy recognized by others, so as to give his actions an international impact.
At the same time all the regimes in the Muslim world, as we know, not the most virtuous, have well understood that they had every interest in passing off their opponents and protesters whoever they were for members of Bin Laden’s organisation, so as to quietly suppress them and even if possible to do so with assistance from the West.
Hence a proliferation of ‘Al Qaeda’ more or less designated or self-proclaimed, in Pakistan, Iraq, Yemen, Somalia, Maghreb, and elsewhere “Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.”
The principal result of this idiotic dialectic has of course been to reinforce the myth of an omnipresent Al Qaeda, lurking behind every Muslim, ready in waiting to hit the West in general, the US of course in particular, in the name of who knows what perversity. And this vision is a product of several errors of judgment and perspective, and it above all generates completely inappropriate retorts.
Because if Al Qaeda doesn’t exist, Islamic political violence well and truly exists. And the West is but an indirect and collateral victim of it.
Violent Islamic ideologues aren’t God’s warriors: they’re people with precise objectives, which isn’t to convert the world to Islam, it’s to take the power and riches which come from the Muslim world, without the West intervening. In a way like Hassan al-Tourabi in his day in Sudan.
Thus, even if the West’s self-esteem has to suffer as a result, we need to constantly repeat that the first, the heaviest, and the main victims of Islamic violence are Muslims themselves.
Of course, one can always disagree that since jihadist violence does exist, and it’s developing pretty much everywhere following the same patterns, that we call it Al Qaeda hardly matters given that is only the generic designation for a certain form of globalized fundamentalist violence.
A number of recently prudent journalists now tell us about “the nebulous Al Qaeda”: the problem is that such a semantic confusion is at the origin of all the incorrect responses thus far, and de facto excludes any adapted solution to the problem.
Every security and intelligence service knows all too well that you don’t confront the ‘Lone Wolf technique’ by means of military action, armored divisions or an inflation of uniform security measures. You confront it by targeted security measures, supported by political, social, economic, educational and cultural initiatives which aim to drain the pool of potential volunteers, by cutting their ideological and financial sponsors.
Not only (and I’m referring to different American treasury reports) was nothing serious undertaken to attempt to curb the underlying financial structure, and even less the ideological structure of jihadist violence, but in designating Al Qaeda as a permanent enemy against which we must lead a crusade by military and security means totally unsuited to how things are, we’ve used a machine gun to kill a mosquito.
Obviously we missed the mosquito but the collateral damage is evident as we can see every day in Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Yemen…
And the 1st effect of this failed crusade has been to feed the pool of volunteers, to legitimize this form of violence, to render it the sole reference of action and possible assertion in a Muslim world in which the collective imagination is now traumatized by a universal law of suspicion that weights them down, through massive military interventions and occupations, both endless and blind.
For 9 years, the West has struck without much discernment in Iraq, Afghanistan, the tribal regions of Pakistan, Somalia, Palestine of course (and we’re now thinking about intervention in Yemen, and while we’re at it why not Iran…), but in the eyes of the Muslims, Bin Laden is still a step ahead of the world’s most powerful army and the Islamic regime in Saudi Arabia stays under America’s absolute protection.
To conclude and try to bring an element of response to the question asked at this roundtable, “Where are we at with Al Qaeda?”, Al Quaeda died between 2002 and 2004.
But before dying it was “impregnated” by western strategic errors and unwise calculations by certain Muslim countries and it’s given birth to little ones.
The problem for us is whether we will commit the same mistakes with the unwelcome offspring, by fueling an indefinite cycle of violence, or to refer back to Ionesco, whether we will partner with the Arabs and Muslims to halt the proliferation of the rhinoceroses.
Thank you.
[Other panel member:]
It goes to show that hands-on experience in difficult conditions, considering the number of honours that Mr. Chouet has accumulated so far, provides an original and mind-blowing understanding. That was really, very interesting.
Script: Demi-Lune
Translation: DJDaveMark
Corrections: Mohshin D
Subtitles: Cristof
Derek Johnson is a licensed Engineer from the University of Texas at Arlington and also American Welding Society Certified Welding Inspector, structural steel AWS D1.1.
“All these floors are just giving way. They’re just falling. An office fire caused the detachment. They just fell, everything just fell. It cascaded. It just fell!… Believe that.”
— Derek Johnson, about the NIST final report on the collapse of WTC Building 7
We have talked about it earlier in October. This was meant to be a historic debate as it was first announced that Niels Harrit and Éric Laurent would also be part of the debate. But their presence was judged inconvenient by TV channel France 2 and they both were censored from the debate at the last minute.
Jean-Marie Bigard who worked on organizing this event wanted a fair and open debate like we’ve seen on Russian TV in 2008. Not only were they capable of debating the official 9/11 story in a civil manner, inviting experts from all places, they also aired the excellent documentary “Zero – An investigation into 9/11” which over 32 millions had a chance to see on prime time TV for the first time.
This French debate turned out to be an orchestrated attack on Kassovitz, Bigard and the 9/11 truth movement by France 2 who had clearly no intention to create a fair and open debate in the first place. We deplore this and hope that a true debate will take place on the French scene soon and that experts like Niels Harrit and Éric Laurent will not be censored in the future. We also invite TV channels from all over the world to organize fair debates and air 9/11 documentaries that raise the most important questions of this part of our century, like “9/11 Blueprint for Truth” and “9/11 Press for Truth.”
9/11 French Debate with English Subtitles
This debate was aired on October 28, 2009 and is now available with English subtitles, thanks to ReOpen911.info.
Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup, the new film by Dylan Avery is now out and available on DVD.
Synopsis
Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup
With the departure of the Bush Administration and the arrival of an “era of transparency,” opportunities are arising for the disclosure of new information that may shed more light on the events that took place before and after 9/11/2001.
Dramatically narrated by Daniel Sunjata of FX’s Rescue Me, and an outspoken advocate for the First Responders, Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup first examines mysterious and infamous events that reshaped world history – from the Reichstag Fire in 1933 that catapulted Hitler to dictatorship – to the Gulf of Tonkin Incident in 1964 that led to the Vietnam War, and then takes viewers on a turbulent journey through several pivotal moments in history before delving into the most significant catastrophe in recent memory, 9/11.
Loaded with powerful, new footage and in-depth interviews with the likes of Steven Earl Jones, an American physicist who has discovered undetonated explosive material in multiple samples of dust from the World Trade Center collapses, this documentary presents a wide array of evidence both known and unknown…until now. Eight years later, the American people continue to live in the aftermath of 9/11 and deal with its ongoing repercussions. Is this just another machination of power on the timeline of history? If so, the real question is what happens next? Or better yet, what can we do to prevent another 9/11?
The film serves as a fundamental call to action which is fueled by hope that those affected by 9/11 will soon receive the answers that they have sought after for nearly a decade.
Get your copy on DVD today
Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup Official Trailer
William Rodriguez is a 9/11 hero for many reasons. The first reason clearly is for his incredible courage on that tragic day. He is known to be the last man out of the North Tower and the reason for this is because he went back in several times to help hundreds of people evacuate. People that are alive today because of his courage and determination to help others. He later received several awards for heroism for helping in the evacuation of many survivors.
Since 9/11, his life has become an incredible journey. He now travels all around the world to tell his story. A story that contradicts the official version of the Bush administration. A story that was completely ignored by the 9/11 Commission and the U.S. mainstream media.
“All of a sudden at 8:46… we hear ‘BOOM!’ An explosion so powerful and so loud that push us upward in the air coming from below. It was so powerful that all the walls cracked, the false ceiling fell on top of us, the sprinkler system got activated and everybody started screaming in horror: ‘HELP! HELP! HELP!’ ” — William Rodriguez
We invite you today to watch this 46 minutes video (in English with French subtitles, thanks to ReOpen911.info) in which William Rodriguez details his incredible and very moving experience that needs to be heard.
William Rodriguez is also a member of NYC CAN, the New York City Coalition for Accountability Now comprised of survivors, first responders, family members and other activists that are calling for a new independent investigation into the events of 9/11.
A message from William Rodriguez:
“The events of 9/11/01 changed the lives of everybody in the new millennium. This event also changed my life forever. I came to work that day not expecting to be a witness of the horror, despair and desolation that was 9/11. On that horrible day I went floor by floor trying to help people as I was one of the few people in the complex with a master key. I helped evacuate many lives, and yet, though they say I am a hero, they, the government officials, the 9/11 Commission and the major media, have all ignored or edited my story: many explosions occurred that morning, explosions that were not related to the impact of the planes. As I learned later, my story did not fit the story the government told. My testimony was omitted from the final report.
At long last though, the New York Coalition for Accountability Now, sponsors of this ballot initiative, are aiming to bring about a real investigation of what really happened that day. That is why I wholeheartedly endorse their efforts and have agreed and am honored to join their Executive Council. We need to bring closure for the victim’s families, friends and survivors, for us all, and the only way to do that is to bring about a full and thorough investigation of 9/11. NYC CAN can do it!”
David Ray Griffin is a public supporter of World for 9/11 Truth. Visit his public supporter profile that includes a list of his most recent books on 9/11.
Film Critic Reviews Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup
On September 11, 2009, the Mayfair Theatre screened the Canadian theatrical premiere of Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup. After the film, Lee Demarbre, owner of the Mayfair and a film critic and filmmaker in his own right, talks about what he thought of the movie.
“I think it’s the best of the four [Loose Change movies] that they’ve put together.” —Lee Demarbre, Filmmaker, CKCU film critic and theatre owner
Great coverage of the 9/11 truth movement ’s protests that took place in New York City on September 11, 2009 by Russia Today. The events were organized mostly by WeAreChange.org.
Russia Today has aired many reports during the last year on the 9/11 truth movement’s activities and news, from a Niels Harrit interview on nanothermite (see below), to covering some Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth historic events, to this protest on the day of the 8th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.
One thing strikes us when we watch those reports: where is the smear campaign? Where is the “name calling” propaganda technique that the US media use against us? Why don’t you label us as crazies and then move on to another topic? It’s easy for Fox News and all the others to completely ignore the information when they do it. Why do you keep on listening to us? Is it maybe because you somehow care about reporting facts, unbiased?
To be serious, we applaud the work of Russia Today. We hope it will inspire the Western mainstream media and maybe one day they too will report on nanothermite and the other important facts that happened on 9/11. A fair coverage of Building 7 anyone? The US people deserve to be informed of what is really happening and it’s sad to see that you have to cross oceans to get it. Perhaps the US media should be investigated under subpoena power and hold accountable for their mediocre work.
“9/11 Truth Movement” demands answers, by Russia Today
In April 2008, French media Canal+ aired a documentary from Stéphane Malterre as part of the show Jeudi Investigation, under the theme “Rumor, intox: the new wars of information”. Canal+’s report was a professional smear job against Loose Change, David Ray Griffin, and the entire 9/11 truth movement. ReOpen911 then published a response on their website entitled When a documentary on disinformation falls into… disinformation!
The months following this report, they noted with some disbelief that this very bad job was very regularly mentioned by journalists who used it to mask their intellectual laziness and endorse their prejudices on this so difficult topic. Thus a large number of mistruths presented in this film were repeated by colleagues of Mr. Malterre.
This new film (in French) that ReOpen911 now proposes is an analysis and decryption of dishonest work of propaganda and demonization that Stéphane Malterre achieved with some talent… just as he prepares to recur.
Charlie Sheen addresses President Barack Obama about 9/11 in a special video message, shortly after releasing his “20 Minutes with the President,” specifically addressing 20 key points that need to be answered by a truly independent investigation.
Sheen’s message is a call to action, not only for President Obama to address the pertinent issues, but for activists everywhere to pressure their representatives and leaders, wherever they may be, to ‘be on the right side of history’ and take back the country through peaceful revolution and true grassroots dissent.
This view of the destruction of the South Tower of the World Trade Center displays a remarkable number of features that support the interpretation that it was destroyed by explosives. I want to acknowledge the tremendous service provided by Nate Flach who serves as the defacto “video archivist” for AE911Truth.
He is the one who first called this video to my attention, because of the huge number of simultaneous squibs on the west side of the building above the impact point. (by David Chandler)
This new DVD, Hot off the press, contains the dynamic multimedia presentation given by Dr. Steven E. Jones in Sacramento, CA on April 30th, 2009.
Steven E. Jones, Ph.D., Physics Professor Emeritus, Brigham Young University, brilliantly presents his carefully researched new discoveries made as he analyzed the dust from the World Trade Center high-rises on 9/11.
Dr. Jones presents the controversial new article in the peer-reviewed “Bentham Open Chemical Physics Journal” – the result of 18 months of intensive scientific collaboration – exposing “the loaded gun of 9/11”. The beauty of the photos and the depth of understanding are breathtaking.
The implications of this new peer-reviewed paper are profound.Nanothermite, a highly engineered energetic nanocomposite, was conceived around 1990. By 2000 it had been weaponized and manufactured in top secret military laboratories. This nano-engineered form of thermite does not just burn extremely hot, it explodes.
This is the first lecture by Steven E. Jones after the publication of the peer-reviewed paper Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal on April 3rd, 2009, which describes that nanothermite, a high-tech, military grade explosive, was used during the destruction of the WTC Twin Towers and Building 7.
Mark your calendar: on September 22nd, 2009, the Loose Change series, which includes the inescapable Loose Change Final Cut, which you can watch on our website, will be enhanced by the heavy weight Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup.
Strong of a 3.5 million dollar budget, a first in the 9/11 Truth documentary industry (Loose Change Final Cut’s budget was about $200,000), and benefiting from Rescue Me Daniel Sunjata’s narration and a worldwide distribution by Microcinema, this new 9/11 film by Dylan Avery promises to be politically explosive. Loaded with powerful, new footage and in-depth interviews with the likes of Steven E. Jones, this documentary will present a wide array of evidence both known and unknown… until now.
The impact of Loose Change, which is the most watched film in Internet history, is undeniable. It has played a huge role in waking millions of people up from around the world on 9/11 facts (most have seen WTC Building 7 collapse for the very first time in this movie), millions that now question the official theory and ask for a new official and independent investigation.
New Teaser for Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup
We will give away 5 copies of Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup, including the 2-hour limited edition extra DVD that includes exclusive interviews, behind-the-scene footage and much more. People who pre-order Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup before September 22nd will also get this extra DVD. The winners of our contest will be randomly selected from our mailing list subscribers. To participate in this contest and to be automatically included in our future draws, you simply need to be an active subscriber of our mailing list. On September 11th, 2009, we will randomly select 5 winners, from anywhere in the world, and they will each receive a copy of this new Loose Change DVD. We will add more videos to this contest very soon, so stay tuned!
Dust to Dust: the Health Effects of 9/11 Just days after 9/11, the EPA assured the public that the air was "safe to breathe" in lower Manhattan. Now many of the first-responders are seriously ill or dying. This disturbing documentary asks whether the EPA’s pronouncement was based on science or politics.
Dust to Dust: The Health Effects of 9/11
William Rodriguez, The Story of The Last Man Out
Film Critic Reviews Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup
Charlie Sheen addresses President Barack Obama about 9/11 in a special video message, shortly after releasing his “
This view of the destruction of the South Tower of the World Trade Center displays a remarkable number of features that support the interpretation that it was destroyed by explosives. I want to acknowledge the tremendous service provided by Nate Flach who serves as the defacto “video archivist” for 
Mark your calendar: on September 22nd, 2009, the Loose Change series, which includes the inescapable Loose Change Final Cut, which you can 
politically explosive. Loaded with powerful, new footage and in-depth interviews with the likes of 
We will give away 5 copies of Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup, including the 
“Building What?” TV Ad Unveiled: 9/11 Family Members Speak Out
Documentary Film – Dust to Dust: The Health Effects of 9/11
When it Really Matters
ACTION ALERT: AE911Truth Washington DC Press Conference and Debate
Glenn Beck: “I didn’t think I could hate victims faster than the 9/11 victims”
US Attempts To Extradite 9/11 FEMA Videographer From Argentina
Sandra Bullock and Tom Hanks to star in 9/11 drama
