• March from Liberty Plaza to WTC 7 at noon each day. • Occupy the park in front of WTC 7 until nightfall. • General Assemblies will be held at 2pm each day to discuss the direction and continuation of the Occupy Building 7 occupation after 11/20.
The Occupy Wall Street movement is a much needed response to decades of growing inequality, financial deregulation, and zero accountability for the crimes that brought about our current economic crisis. Millions throughout the nation and across globe who feel they have no voice in our political system have come to embrace “Occupy” as an expression of their anger, frustration and hope.
Ten years later, it is time for us to give voice to our own growing frustration by aligning firmly with the Occupy movement and making 9/11 one of the key issues the Occupy movement stands for.
On Saturday November 19 and Sunday November 20, we will march from Liberty Plaza to Building 7 and occupy the park in front of Building 7 until nightfall. We hope this will mark the beginning of a sustained Occupy Building 7 movement that will grow and finally bring meaningful attention to the obvious demolition of World Trade Center Building 7 and the dire need for a new 9/11 investigation. At 2pm each day we will hold a General Assembly to discuss the direction and continuation of the Occupy Building 7 occupation after November 20.
Go to OccupyBuilding7.org to learn more and to start following #OccupyBuilding7 on Twitter. On the website you will find fliers that you can print and hand out at Liberty Plaza as well as web banners that you can post on your website to help spread the word.
We are attempting to get Occupy Building 7 on the official Occupy Wall Street calendar, and we anticipate being joined by hundreds of Occupy Wall Street protesters. Most of the protesters at Liberty Plaza are keenly aware of 9/11. A lot of them already knew about it; others have been educated over the last several weeks thanks to the 9/11 activists who have given their time and energy to be there. Let us hope that by the time November 19 rolls around, there will be hundreds, if not thousands of Occupy activists eager to help us make Occupy Building 7 a part of the broader Occupy movement.
If you can make it to New York on November 19, please meet us at Liberty Plaza at noon, and let’s make history.
During an interview on Democracy Now! (video below) to discuss his new Book Here Comes Trouble: Stories from My Life, filmmaker, author and activist Michael Moore publicly endorsed the idea of a new 9/11 probe. Notwithstanding that he directed the excellent 2004 documentary Fahrenheit 9/11 — and got both vilified and acclaimed for his film (it won the 2004 Cannes Film Festival Palme d’Or) — it is the first time, to our knowledge, that Michael Moore backs a new 9/11 investigation on the public stage.
“I think there is a lot of unanswered questions and they should be answered.” — Michael Moore, in support of a new 9/11 investigation
Interview: Michael Moore Supports a New 9/11 Investigation
“In this, his tenth book on 9/11 and its consequences, David Ray Griffin continues to report the facts and marshal the evidence that the mainstream media continue to ignore. Having previously demolished the official 9/11 story, Griffin now explains how the government got away with its crime against democracy.” — Paul Craig Roberts, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under Ronald Reagan
“Why yet another book on 9/11? Because, as David Ray Griffin points out clearly and persuasively, 9/11 continues to be not only the greatest crime in American history, but also the most strenuously covered up, and certainly the crime with the greatest political consequences. He shows how over a decade the events of 9/11 and the reports on them have been used to attack the American democratic system. Above all, he documents the success of this attack by the refusal of the media, the academy, and religious institutions to openly discuss these matters, and by the numbers of critics who at one extreme have made fools of themselves in echoing the Orwellian official version, and at the other extreme have been either fired or silenced after their dissent from it.” — Peter Dale Scott, former Canadian diplomat, professor at the University of California, and author of American War Machine.
Lupe Fiasco has been known to espouse some controversial views about American society and government, and over the weekend he put his money where his mouth is by attending a large protest rally in downtown New York. Dubbed “Occupy Wall Street,” the protesters say they were inspired by recent revolutions in the Arab world to use “mass occupation to restore democracy in America.”
While at the protest, Lupe was interviewed by an organization called We Are Change. He shared his views about the need to investigate 9/11 and the existence of a “New World Order.”
Luke Rudkowski Interviews Lupe Fiasco
“There was never really a real, proper investigation,” Lupe said of 9/11 and the collapse of 7 World Trade Center or “Building 7,” which many conspiracy theorists maintain was detonated by the U.S. government. “It’s just something that always stood out as a sort of elephant in the room for me.”
Numerous public investigations by the National Institute of Standards and Technology and others have provided evidence that the lower levels of 7 World Trade Center caught fire after the North Tower fell and burned for hours before its eventual collapse. But on his song “Words I Never Said,” Lupe poked at the issue.
[World911Truth Note: 1,600 architects and engineers have disproved the NIST conclusions which claims that a 47-story building could have collapsed at free fall acceleration, in under 7 seconds, simply because normal office fires. They are backed by numerous scientists from around the world and by 9/11 first responders and 9/11 family members, who are all calling for a new 9/11 investigation on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7. More: RememberBuilding7.org]
“9/11, Building 7, Did they really pull it?” he rhymed.
“I think the New World Order is something that is deliberate and in the public,” Lupe said, when asked about secret meetings by “elites” in order to consolidate power.
“I don’t think it’s as nefarious as a lot of people make it out to be. It’s just a lot of things that we silently allow to happen,” he said. Lupe cited average citizens who own stock in certain corporations via their 401(k) or who support ExxonMobile by filling up their gas tank as being complicit in the system that upholds the status quo.
Lupe clarified that he doesn’t want to push an agenda, but sees himself as a critical thinker.
“I’m not on any side of the fence,” he said at one point. “My thing is, let’s just get to the truth.”
Join 23-year architect Richard Gage, AIA, in this feature length documentary with cutting-edge 9/11 evidence from more than 50 top experts in their fields — high-rise architects, structural engineers, physicists, chemical engineers, firefighters, metallurgists, explosives experts, controlled demolition technicians, and more.
Each is highly qualified in his/her respective fields. Several have Ph.D’s — including National Medal of Science awardee Lynn Margulis. She, along with the other experts, exposes the fraud of NIST and discusses how the scientific method should have been applied and acknowledges the “overwhelming” evidence of high temperature incendiaries in all dust samples of the WTC. High-rise architects and structural engineers layout the evidence in the features of the destruction of these three high-rises that point inevitably to explosive controlled demolition. 9/11 family members and psychologists ground the technical information with heart centered support for a new investigation and a close look at the psychology of 9/11in this milestone production of AE911Truth.
NEW 9/11 Explosive Documentary Film: The Experts Speak Out
This is the feature-length, Pre-Release, Low-Res documentary by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
Help us to make the most of the opportunity provided by the 10th anniversary of 9/11 to publicize the evidence about the destruction of the 3 WTC high-rises on 9/11. Visit the dedicated website 911ExpertsSpeakOut.org to watch or download the high-res video. Support AE911Truth by sharing the website www.911ExpertsSpeakOut.org with your family, friends, and associates — and have them watch it on high resolution Pay Per View and/or download.
If you watched the YouTube low-res video for free, please consider supporting AE911Truth with your $5 or $10 donation so we can complete the film’s Final Release before November. Click here to donate.
France: 58% Doubt the Official 9/11 Version, Only 14% Know About Building 7
A giant U.S. flag is displayed in front of the Eiffel tower during a solemn tribute to the victims of the 9/11 attacks on September 11, 2011, at the Trocadero square in Paris. (Miguel Medina/AFP/Getty Images)
Ten years after, how do the French perceive the events of September 11, 2001? With the support of its members and sympathizers, the French association ReOpen911 has commissioned a survey on the subject by an independent organization and have published their results on September 9.
To this date, two surveys of this type have been made available in France: one by “TNS Sofres/Logica” for the French newsmagazine “NouvelObs” and another by World Public Opinion which was conducted in France as well as in 16 other countries. These surveys, which date back to September 2008, are already three years old, and the questions asked at the time do not measure the degree of skepticism of the population regarding the official story of the 9/11 Commission and the Bush administration.
For this reason, the French association ReOpen911 requested an opinion poll by HEC Junior Consulting. The official junior company of the business school HEC Paris, HEC Junior Consulting was ranked first in its sector by the newsmagazine “Expansion” in 2009. The school has also been a finalist for the CNJI award for excellence every year since 2004. The survey was conducted in June 2011 based on a cross-section sample of the French population [1].
This survey is very revealing about the opinion of the French on the subject of 9/11.
58% of the French population express doubts about the official version, compared to only 31% who express no doubts.
Only 14% know that three towers collapsed on September 11, 2001.
Nearly half of French respondents (49%) believe that US authorities may have let the attacks occur.
One third (34%) believe that some US authorities may have been involved in the attacks.
49% are favorable to opening an independent inquiry to determine more about the events.
Only 28% consider that the media have informed the public about September 11 in the fullest possible manner.
Poll Questions
Question 1: Would you say that 9/11 is still a topical issue?
Remarkably, ten years after the event, 65% of the French population consider that 9/11 is still a topical issue.
Despite the announced death of Bin Laden, the repatriation of troops from Iraq and the expected repatriation of troops from Afghanistan, the uprisings in the Arab world and a highly eventful 2011 in general (financial crisis, Fukushima disaster, etc.), the French do not consider the issue out-of-date.
Question 2: Do you believe the Bush administration said everything it knew about the 9/11 attacks?
The well-known reporter, Eric Laurent, author of a deep inquiry into the subject, spoke of 911 as “a collection of lies, surrounded by mystery” (France 2 television program “On a tout Essayé”, October 12, 2004, 01:35 min). Today, 72% of the French believe that the Bush administration has not said everything it knew about the events.
In comparison, a survey conducted in Germany by “TNS Emnid” for the magazine “Welt der Wunder” posed the following question:
Do you believe that the US government told the entire truth about the 2001 attacks?
French HEC survey: No; 72%, Yes; 15.6% German TNS survey: No; 89.5%, Yes; 9.2%
The percentage is significantly higher in Germany where 89.5% of the population believe the US government did not tell the entire truth. This is also the opinion in the US where, as early as 2006, 81% of the population believed that the administration was not telling the entire truth. (CBS News / New York Times poll, October 2006) [2].
Question 3: What is your opinion of the official version of the attacks on September 11?
58% of those surveyed express doubts about the official version, compared to only 31% who accept it as the truth.
In a context where public expression of doubt, even when expressed cautiously, is met with violent opposition, 58% is a surprising score. Although a majority of the French population is skeptic, skeptics are generally presented in a negative light and as being a tiny majority by the media.
It is worth pointing out that skepticism concerning the official version of 9/11 is increasing significantly in France. Skeptics, who comprised only between 20% and 30% of the French population surveyed in 2008 (based on two surveys from September 2008), comprise 58% three years later.
The number of persons in France expressing serious doubts is however smaller than those in the US where, as early as 2006, 28% believed that the members of the Bush administration had “all lied” (CBS News / New York Times poll, October 2006) [2], compared to 12% in France in 2011.
Question 4: How many towers collapsed on September 11, 2001?
Open question (responders were not prompted)
Only 14% of the French population know that three towers fell on 9/11.
A comparative analysis between question 3 and question 4 shows that people who know about the collapse of World Trade Center 7 are more incline to express doubts about the official version than those who don’t know about this building.
Question 5: During the last few years, would you say the media have tended to:
Only 28% of French respondents consider that the media informed the public about September 11 in the fullest possible manner.
Much can be learned by comparing this information with the results of TNS Sofres / La Croix de 2011 study which reveal that 40% of the French population believe that the quality of media is deteriorating as opposed to 21% who believe it is improving.
Question 6: Do you think that US authorities were informed in advance of the attacks and let the attacks occur?
See the results in the chart under question 7.
Question 7: Do you think that parts of the US authorities were involved in carrying out the attacks?
Nearly half of those surveyed (49%) believe that US authorities may have let the attacks occur.
A third of those surveyed (34%) believe that some US authorities may have been involved in carrying out the attacks.
Question 8: Would you be favorable toward opening:
• an in-depth public debate on the events of 9/11?
• an independent inquiry to find out more about these events?
It should also be noted here that almost half (48%) of all New Yorkers are favorable to opening a new inquiry on the collapse of building 7 (Stena Research Institute survey, May 2011).
References
(1) Survey conducted from June 6 to 24, 2011 using a cross-section sample of the French population, (500 people interviewed by telephone). By comparison, the World Public Opinion survey was conducted with 600 French respondents.
(2) (CBS News / New York Times poll, October 2006) The exact question and possible answers were: Concerning September 11 and the US intelligence service, “do you think that the members of the Bush administration are telling you the truth, are mainly telling the truth but hiding something, or are simply lying to you?”.
Are telling the truth: 16% Are mainly telling the truth but hiding something: 53% Are simply lying: 28% No opinion: 3%
In less than one month, this important video narrated by American actor Ed Asner, and produced by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth.org), got more than 500,000 views on YouTube. This group of over 1,500 professionals is calling for a real scientific investigation into the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7.
Take Action
We invite you to share this important video on Facebook, Twitter and other social forums so more people can watch it. Let’s go viral with this 15-minute documentary and it will hit 1 million viewers soon.
If you support a new Building 7 investigation, join the Remember Building 7 campaign led by 9/11 family members, first responders and survivors and backed by AE911Truth.
If you are an architect or an engineer and feel like we need a new investigation into Building 7′s collapse, please sign this group’s petition. If you know an architect or an engineer, send them this video.
Dick Cheney is coming to Vancouver on September 26 to promote his book In My Time: A Personal and Political Memoir. But Vancouver lawyer Gail Davidson has other plans for one of the most controversial figures of the modern era, a powerful man who publicly admitted having allowed torture.
The cofounder of the international group Lawyers Against the War wants the government of Canada either to bar the former U.S. vice president from entering the country or, if he’s allowed in, to arrest and prosecute him for torture, war offences, and crimes against humanity. And if Canada isn’t keen on punishing the ex–vice president to former president George W. Bush, Davidson argues, then it should extradite Cheney to a country that is willing and able to prosecute him.
One of the most vocal defenders of U.S. foreign policy, specifically the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, Cheney is the first featured speaker in the 2011–12 series of Vancouver’s Bon Mot Book Club.
“It’s a bit chilling that they would invite a mass murderer as their guest to Canada,” Davidson told the Georgia Straight by phone, “when any one of them would know full well that because of the founded accusations made against Mr. Cheney, that he’s persona non grata in Canada, being accused of international crimes, torture, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.”
Organizer Leah Costello explained that the Bon Mot Book Club is an “intimate and exclusive high-end dinner series”, wherein her company Curious Mind Productions Inc. brings in world leaders and other high-profile speakers. Cheney will speak at a dinner event at the Vancouver Club.
“I haven’t heard anything yet,” Costello told the Straight by phone, when asked if she expects protests to greet Cheney. “But I have heard that he’s a controversial figure. That’s for sure.”
Dick Cheney is coming to Vancouver on September 26 to promote his book In My Time: A Personal and Political Memoir. But Vancouver lawyer Gail Davidson has other plans for one of the most controversial figures of the modern era, a powerful man who publicly admitted having allowed torture.
The cofounder of the international group Lawyers Against the War wants the government of Canada either to bar the former U.S. vice president from entering the country or, if he’s allowed in, to arrest and prosecute him for torture, war offences, and crimes against humanity. And if Canada isn’t keen on punishing the ex–vice president to former president George W. Bush, Davidson argues, then it should extradite Cheney to a country that is willing and able to prosecute him.
John McCain: Waterboarding is Torture
In a recent NBC interview, Cheney declared that he had “no regrets” that the American government used torture against terrorism suspects.
Asked if the U.S. should still use widely condemned techniques like waterboarding, Cheney responded: “I would strongly support using it again if circumstances arose where we had a high-value detainee and that was the only way we could get him to talk.”
According to Davidson, the government is obliged under local and international laws—such as the United Nations’ Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment—to deny safe haven and prosecute persons accused of crimes like torture. Davidson is writing Prime Minister Stephen Harper and key cabinet ministers to outline evidence against the Bush administration and its senior officials.
“The role of Mr. Cheney is that he authorized, directed, ordered, supervised, and failed to prevent the commission of a wide range of crimes against humanity and war crimes,” Davidson said.
She has previously written to the government, suggesting steps similar to those regarding Cheney be taken when Bush visits Surrey on October 20. The ex-president has been invited by Mayor Diane Watts to the Surrey Regional Economic Summit.
In her letter dated August 25 regarding Bush’s visit, Davidson cited a transcript of a U.S. interview with Cheney in May 2009, in which Cheney stated that Bush authorized torture. He said: “I mean it was a presidential-level decision. And the decision went to the president. He signed off on it.”
Speaking to the Straight, Davidson said that the evidence against the Bush administration is well known and part of the public record. The documentation contained in Davidson’s August 25 letter includes a statement from now retired U.S. army Maj.-Gen. Antonio Taguba, who looked into abuses at Iraq’s Abu Ghraib prison. Taguba stated that “the Commander-in-Chief [Bush] and those under him authorized a systematic regime of torture”.
The Vancouver lawyer also cited a 2004 report by the International Committee of the Red Cross that the American military used interrogation techniques amounting to torture on prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, a U.S. naval base in Cuba. She likewise mentioned a 2007 Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly report that spoke about a “whole series of illegal acts in Europe” by the CIA through “extraordinary rendition”, a practice in which individuals are abducted from one country and sent to another, to be detained and tortured for information in secret locations.
Davidson stressed that when Canada ratified the international convention against torture, it accepted a duty not just to Canadians but to everyone. And that is to “take effective measures to prevent and punish torture wherever it occurs, whatever the nationality of the victims are, and whatever the nationality of the perpetrators”.
Remember Building 7 continues to educate millions of people on both sides of the Atlantic. France’s second largest public channel did the campaign justice in one of the most unbiased pieces ever done by a mainstream news outlet.
If you want this kind of news coverage to multiply, please join thousands of others in making a donation on the 10th Anniversary.
Ten years after 9/11, thousands of soldiers have died in the 9/11 wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and hundreds of thousands of innocent people have died in the process.
Today, soldiers are speaking up. But are we listening?
Please support a new 9/11 investigation so we can all find the truth about what really happened that day and move toward peace and reconciliation.
First responders and 9/11 family members are currently seeking our collective support for the largest 9/11 campaign ever.
Only 25% of New Yorkers have ever seen footage of Building 7′s destruction. The RememberBuilding7.org Campaign has the potential to expose over 10 million in the NYC area to Building 7′s collapse, an utmost needed strategy to create a new massive public discussion on the need for a new investigation.
Support the troops who want to come home. Support a new 9/11 investigation. Support the 9/11 families and first responders who need us to stand by their side now. Support the end of the 9/11 wars.
The International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001, also known at the Toronto Hearings are currently being held at Ryerson University in Toronto, Canada, through September 11.
Get a free copy of the Toronto Hearings DVD and Final Report with a donation to the 10th Anniversary Campaign led by 9/11 family members at RememberBuilding7.org, a thank you gift for your support in the largest 9/11 campaign ever. Click here to learn more.
At the hearings, expert witnesses are presenting evidence that the U.S. government’s investigation into the events of that day was seriously flawed and failed to account for what happened.
Thursday, September 8, 2011 9:00 – 9:30 Moderators: Opening Remarks 9:30 – 9:45 James Gourley: Introduction to the Hearings and the Panel 9:45 – 10:15 Lorie Van Auken (Video): Statement by a Jersey Widow 10:30 – 12:00 Lance deHaven-Smith: 9/11 & State Crimes Against Democracy 1:00 – 2:30 David Ray Griffin: Inadequacies of the 9/11 Commission’s Report 2:45 – 4:15 Kevin Ryan: Inadequacies of the Reports by the National Institute of Standards and Technology 4:15 – 5:00 Audience Question and Answer
Friday, September 9, 2011 9:00 – 9:15 Moderators: Overview of the Day’s Testimony 9:15 – 10:30 Jay Kolar: The Alleged 9/11 Hijackers 10:45 – 12:00 Paul Zarembka: Evidence of Insider Trading Before 9/11 1:00 – 1:35 Barbara Honegger: Eyewitnesses and Evidence of Explosions at the Pentagon 1:35 – 3:10 Richard Gage: Evidence of the Demolition of WTC: An Overview 3:30 – 4:45 Michel Chossudovsky: Global Consequences of 9/11 4:45 – 5:25 Cynthia McKinney: Attempts to Raise Questions about 9/11 5:25- 5:50 Audience Question and Answer
Saturday, September 10, 2011 9:00 – 9:15 Moderators: Overview of the Day’s Testimony 9:15 – 10:30 Graeme MacQueen: Eyewitness Evidence of Explosions at WTC 10:45 – 12:00 David Chandler: WTC 7: A Refutation of the Official Account 1:00 – 2:15 Jon Cole: The Official Account and the Experimental Method 2:15 – 3:30 Kevin Ryan: Extreme Temperatures 3:45 – 5:00 Niels Harrit: Incendiary/Explosive Residue in the WTC Dust 5:00 – 5:30 Audience Question and Answer
Sunday, September 11, 2011 9:00 – 9:15 Moderators: Opening remarks and Moment of Silence 9:15 – 10:45 David Ray Griffin: Anomalies of Flights 77 and 93 10:45 – 12:00 Peter Dale Scott: 9/11 and Deep State Politics 1:00 – 2:00 Laurie Manwell: SCADs and Psychological Resistance to Alternative Accounts 2:00 – 3:15 Senator Mike Gravel: State Deception in the Past and Today 3:30 – 4:15 Audience Question and Answer
Reason #3 to Donate to the 10th Anniversary Campaign: You Will Receive Free Copies of the Toronto Hearings DVD and Final Report
September 6, 2011
The International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 will be held in Toronto, Canada at Ryerson University from September 8 through September 11. At the hearings, expert witnesses will present evidence that the U.S. government’s investigation into the events of that day was seriously flawed and failed to account for what happened.
The result of this historic event will be the creation of the Final Report of the International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001, and a DVD of the event including the testimony of every expert witness.
Because the Remember Building 7 10th Anniversary Campaign is a proud sponsor of the Toronto Hearings, when you make a generous donation of $100 to the 10th Anniversary Campaign, you will receive a copy of The 9/11 Toronto Report and DVD in the mail. And if you make a donation of $50, you will receive a copy of the DVD.
Do not miss this incredible opportunity to support the 10th Anniversary Campaign and receive complimentary copies of The 9/11 Toronto Report and DVD. Donate Now!
I have already donated, will I get the DVD and Final Report?
If you have already donated at least $100 to the 10th Anniversary Campaign, you will receive a copy of the Final Report and DVD – you don’t need to donate again. The same goes for those of you who already donated between $50 and $99 –you will receive the DVD.
If you already donated a sum less than $50 or $100, you can make an additional donation to bring your cumulative donation total up to $50 or $100 and you will receive the corresponding gift.
If you already donated $50, please do not hesitate to donate another $50 and receive your complimentary 9/11 Toronto Report in addition to the DVD.
Please Donate Now and thank you for you generous support!
Only with your support can this campaign be a success. Donate Now
From September 1 to 11, Remember Building 7 has the ambitious goal of raising $1 million to fund the largest 9/11 awareness campaign ever created in 10 years.
This group is backed by 9/11 Family Members, First Responders, Architects & Engineers, and countless others.
Why should we support and donate to this campaign? Here are the top 5 reasons:
Reason #1: The TV and Poster Ads Will Reach 10 Million New Yorkers
Raising $1 million between September 1 and September 11 will enable Remember Building 7 to reach 10 million people in the New York Metropolitan Area through a combination of TV and out-of-home advertising. A whopping 60% of the target market will see the ads on TV or on the subway an average of 10 times each.
A recent poll showed that only 25% of New Yorkers ever saw footage of Building 7. This campaign is trying to raise this incredibly low number to above 75%.
This initiative has the potential to create a much needed public discussion around Building 7 and for this reason alone, we should all support the campaign and donate what we can.
Reason #2: Print Ads Will Reach 2 Million in Major U.S. Cities
As if reaching out to 10 millions in NYC was not enough for this group, they plan to publish print ads in Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Dallas newspapers.
They will reach an extra 2 million Americans with these ads and raise the total of people exposed to Building 7 to 12 million.
If you want to see this happen, please support this campaign!
Reason #3: Production of the Toronto Hearings DVD and Final Report
The 9/11 International Hearings will be held in Toronto, Canada, from September 8 to September 11. During these Hearings, various expert witnesses will present the best available evidence into the case, discovered in the ten years since the 9/11 events occurred.
Evidence will be presented to a panel by the following expert witnesses including: former US Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney, former US Senator Mike Gravel, author and former diplomat Peter Dale Scott, author and professor David Ray Griffin, author and professor Michel Chossudovsky, AIA Architect Richard Gage, Prof. Niels Harrit, 9/11 whistleblower Kevin Ryan and many more.
The campaign by Remember Building 7 will finance the production of the DVD and the final report of the Toronto Hearings.
UPDATE: When you make a donation to this campaign, you will get free copies of the Toronto Hearings DVD and Final Report. All details on RememberBuilding7.org/10
Reason #4: Distribution of the New AE911Truth DVD to the U.S. Congress and New York City Council
In an effort to move closer to a new and real investigation into Building 7, this campaign will finance the distribution of the excellent new AE911Truth documentary to each U.S. Congress Member, to each New York City Council Member and to the Manhattan District Attorney.
To watch a 15-minute version of the new documentary which focuses on Building 7, click here.
Reason #5: To support the 9/11 Families and First Responders Calling for a New Building 7 Investigation
Ten years ago, 9/11 families were the ones who forced the U.S. administration to investigate 9/11. As crazy as it sounds, if it was not of the involvement of the 9/11 families and the support of the public at the time, there would have been no investigation into one of the most serious crimes on American soil.
Today, 9/11 family members and first responders have put together Remember Building 7 and they are still looking for our collective support. They know that exposing 10 million+ New Yorkers to Building 7′s footage is a primary key in the battle for a new investigation.
Watch the documentary 9/11 Press for Truth to learn about the story of the 9/11 families who fought for an investigation.
2) Take a few minutes to spread this page and the RememberBuilding7.org/10website on the Internet. The use of social media is a very effective way to promote this campaign. So don’t hesitate to spread it on Twitter, Facebook and others to help us reach thousands more.
Thank you for being a part of the largest 9/11 campaign yet.
A Siena Poll (PDF) published earlier this year found that 3 out of 4 New Yorkers have never seen any footage of Building 7′s destruction.
The 10th Anniversary Campaign by Remember Building 7 has the ambitious goal of exposing over 10 million people in the NY metropolitan area to footage of Building 7. For the first time in 10 years, an initiative by 9/11 Family Members and First Responders has the potential to show Building 7 to the masses, and create a new public discussion about the collapse of that building.
If you also believe New Yorkers have the right to know about Building 7 and see footage of its collapse, then make a donation to the campaign because they can’t do it without your support.
This campaign has the potential to show Building 7 to most New Yorkers. A task their media has failed to accomplish in 10 years.
It’s time to unite and support the 9/11 families and first responders still calling for a real investigation into Building 7′s collapse.
Video: 1,500 Architects and Engineers Call For New Building 7 Probe
Obama, Bush, Bloomberg to Bar 9/11 First Responders From Ground Zero On the 10th Anniversary
By World911Truth, CNN, The Huffington Post, NY1 and others
Nearly 1,020 first responders have lost their lives in the last 10 years due to health problems caused by the air quality at Ground Zero.
Many more are still suffering from health problems, while still battling with the U.S. Government for proper health coverage.
The first responders who lost their lives since 9/11 add to the victim total of that tragic day. Not only should we honor them for their service and courage — after all, they were the ones who stood up when we were all in shock — but they should be at the center stage of the upcoming official ceremony in New York City.
When debris rained from the sky in lower Manhattan on September 11, 2001, the first responders to the 9/11 attack did not turn away. They rushed to the World Trade Center buildings while the world around them crumbled. Yet now, after all the wreckage has been cleared and the rebuilding has begun, their path is again blocked by space constraints and politics.
NY1 Report
Politicians More Important Than 9/11 First Responders
In addition to the victims’ families, several politicians, including two presidents, are expected to be in attendance.
Politicians have barred these brave men and women from the official ceremony site this year. The first responders are not invited to this year’s September 11 memorial ceremony at ground zero, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s office confirmed in August.
In a statement, Bloomberg spokesman Andrew Brent said the commemoration ceremony is for the victims’ families.
“While we are again focused on accommodating victims’ family members, given the space constraints, we’re working to find ways to recognize and honor first responders, and other groups, at different places and times,” Brent said.
But first responder John Feal, founder of an advocacy group for the police officers, firefighters, civilian volunteers and others who worked at ground zero, assailed Brent’s response, saying Bloomberg “lives in his own world.”
“The best of the best that this country offered 10 years ago are being neglected and denied their rightful place,” Feal said.
Yet first responder Morris Faitelewicz, vice president of the Auxiliary Police Supervisors Benevolent Association, called that explanation “nonsense.” Faitelewicz said that, while there are not usually formal invitations, first responders have been able to attend all of the previous ceremonies simply by showing up.
Denise Villamia, a first responder who worked at ground zero for several months, cried over the phone as she recalled her “totally heartbroken” reaction to the news that she could not attend the memorial service.
“I’m crying because it’s really a big betrayal on the part of the city, to rob me from my way to pay homage and to find that comfort and healing,” she said. “I feel that I have been robbed of my way to pay tribute.”
Not allowing them to attend this year — the 10th anniversary of the terror attacks — is an especially galling affront, he said.
The Ultimate Insult: All First Responders to Go Through FBI’s Terrorist Watch List To Get Health Coverage
As if barring them from this year’s ceremony was not enough, the tens of thousands of cops, firefighters, construction workers and others who risked their lives were recently informed that their names must be run through the FBI’s terrorism watch list. Any of the responders who are not compared to the database of suspected terrorists would be barred from getting treatment for the numerous, worsening ailments that the James Zadroga 9/11 Health And Compensation Law was passed to address. Why are we accepting this?
Despite the passage in December of the $4.2 billion Zagroda Act, which provides medical treatment and compensation to responders, many first responders told CNN that the government has failed to address their health needs.
Giebfried has suffered from a failing liver and kidneys, a crushed arm, elbow and wrist; post-traumatic stress disorder, chronic fatigue, encroaching lupus and other diseases. All were caused by the dust, debris and other substances to which she was exposed on 9/11, she said.
Giebfried said her ongoing medical travails have disabused her of the belief that the United States honors and looks after its service members. Being excluded from the memorial proceedings was yet another confirmation of this, she said.
Remember Building 7 and 9/11 First Responder On The Alex Jones Show
Obama, Bush and Bloomberg Should Bar Themselves From 9/11 Ceremony in New York City
Leaving first responders and survivors out of the 10th anniversary is absolutely ludicrous and we should all be concerned of the message it sends to those who will have to stand up for their country and fellow brothers and sisters in need if another terrorist attack ever occurs again on American soil.
U.S politicians, including Barack Obama and former President George W. Bush have missed a golden occasion for reconciliation with a group that deserves our outmost respect. If their presence makes it too “difficult” to allow 9/11 first responders on the site, they should bar themselves from ground zero instead of positioning for the camera, and leave room for the true heros of our generation. They should pick another spot in their obvious goal to stand before the cameras and gain political points.
There is still time for either, politicians to realize the mess they are creating, once again, in the only name of “politics”, and to accommodate 9/11 first responders to the site, or for us to stand up and tell that very government they are not invited to the ceremony.
Because one thing is clear, if 9/11 first responders are not allowed on the site this year, it will be yet another huge slap in the face to all Americans from a political system that has failed them far too many times. And at the end, the only people we will have to blame for this hard-to-believe mess is we, the people, for not standing up for those who risked and gave their lives for us.
If all of this has not enraged you yet, we invite you to watch this documentary because it clearly will.
9/11 Documentary -- Dust to Dust, The Health Effects of 9/11
“To the living we owe respect, but to the dead we owe only the truth.” — Voltaire
This new 15-minute documentary narrated by actor Ed Asner features AE911Truth experts including structural engineers, chemical engineers, physicists and others.
The 10th Anniversary Campaign will finance the production and mailing of the new AE911Truth DVD to every member of the U.S. Congress, to each New York City Council Member and to the Manhattan District Attorney. This new viral video on the Internet got over 130,000 views on YouTube alone after only one week.
10th Anniversary: Largest 9/11 Campaign Kicks Off Worldwide
The largest campaign calling for a new and real investigation into the 9/11 attacks has officially kicked off. Remember Bulding 7, a non-partisan effort led by 9/11 family members, is planning to flood New York television channels with a new 30-second TV ad, the New York subway with a series of posters, and several other U.S. cities with print advertising.
The new ads features 9/11 family members, architects & engineers, first responders and U.S. military veterans, all supporting a new investigation into the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7, a 47-storey building that collapsed at free fall at 5:20pm on September 11, 2001.
10th Anniversary Campaign Ads
Activists and Citizens United Behind a New Investigation
Along with this unprecedented initiative by Remember Bulding 7 aimed at collecting $1 million dollars in the week leading to the 10th anniversary in order to fund their advertising arsenal, another important 9/11 group is launching one of the most striking and professional 9/11 documentary seen in years.
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth’s new documentary film entitled 9/11 Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out will shake things up during this 10th anniversary and beyond. A 15-minute mini version focusing on Building 7 is available to watch on RememberBuilding7.org/10 and you should watch it to understand how powerful it is and how important of a tool it will become for all of 9/11 activists. Narrated by Ed Asner, American actor and former president of the Screen Actors Guild, this 15-minutes mini-documentary features numerous experts including structural engineers, chemical engineers, physicists and others, questioning the impossible conclusions of NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technologies), an agency of the American Department of Commerce, which concluded that the collapse of WTC Building 7 was strictly due to “normal office fires fueled by office furnishings.”
This new documentary by AE911Truth is a quantum leap forward to a new, independent investigation and an educational tool that will disturb the most 9/11 truth skeptics.
The Remember Bulding 7 10th anniversary campaign will also fund a project to send DVD copies of this new documentary to every member of the U.S. Congress, to every New York City Council member and to Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr.
Last but not least, Toronto, the largest Canadian city, will become home of the long-awaited 9/11 International Hearings which will last from September 8 to 11. The Hearings will be moderated by Michael Keefer (Professor of English at the University of Guelph and former president of the Association of Canadian College and University Teachers of English) and Matthew Witt (Associate Professor of Public Administration at the University of LaVerne) and the final report will be edited by American attorney James Gourley.
During these Hearings, which will be broadcasted via the Internet, various expert witnesses will present the best available evidence discovered in the ten years since the 9/11 events occurred.
The Toronto Hearings will also be supported financially by the Remember Building 710th Anniversary Campaign.
Make THE Pledge Now
By actively supporting and promoting other important campaigns while launching the largest 9/11 ad campaign ever seen, Remember Building 7 is positioning itself as a key player in this grassroots movement.
We therefore invite you to make the pledge to support the 10th Anniversary Campaign financially. If you also believe that 10 years has been too long for a real investigation into the events that changed everyone’s life, and if you also think it is unacceptable that only 25% of New Yorkers have ever seen footage of the destruction of Building 7, then stand with us and help make this campaign a success that will resonate throughout the United States and around the world.
This is the most serious, most professional and largest 9/11 campaign ever organized and we are proud to help make a difference.
Now, stop reading this, visit RememberBuilding7.org/10, watch the ads and the 15-minute AE911Truth documentary, and — most importantly — make the pledge now to make it happen.
Upcoming: the Largest 9/11 Web Activists Team
The largest 9/11 campaign ever deserves to be supported by the largest 9/11 web team of activists ever.
In the coming days, World911Truth.org will launch a worldwide grassroots campaign to create a web activist team dedicated to ensure the success of 10th anniversary campaigns by Remember Building 7, AE911Truth and the 9/11 International Hearings in Toronto. We believe this is a necessary step to counteract the “official propaganda” that we are all about to witness once again this year from the mainstream media. If you want to be part of this worldwide team, join our Facebook page and stay tuned!
TEN YEARS IS TOO LONG
Thousands of lives lost on 9/11. Thousands of lives lost since. Trillions of dollars wasted. Ten years of policies based on a myth.
A federal judge has ruled that former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld can be sued personally for damages by a former U.S. military contractor who says he was tortured during a nine-month imprisonment in Iraq.
The lawsuit lays out a dramatic tale of the disappearance of the then-civilian contractor, an Army veteran in his 50s whose identity is being withheld from court filings for fear of retaliation. Attorneys for the man, who speaks five languages and worked as a translator for Marines collecting intelligence in Iraq, say he was preparing to come home to the United States on annual leave when he was abducted by the U.S. military and held without justification while his family knew nothing about his whereabouts or even whether he was still alive.
The government says he was suspected of helping pass classified information to the enemy and helping anti-coalition forces get into Iraq. But he was never charged with a crime, and he says he never broke the law and was risking his life to help his country.
Court papers filed on his behalf say he was repeatedly abused while being held at Camp Cropper, a U.S. military facility near the Baghdad airport dedicated to holding “high-value” detainees, then suddenly released without explanation in August 2006.
Two years later, he filed suit in U.S. District Court in Washington arguing that Rumsfeld personally approved torturous interrogation techniques on a case-by-case basis and controlled his detention without access to courts in violation of his constitutional rights.
Chicago attorney Mike Kanovitz, who is representing the plaintiff, says it appears the military wanted to keep his client behind bars so he couldn’t tell anyone about an important contact he made with a leading sheik while helping collect intelligence in Iraq.
“The U.S. government wasn’t ready for the rest of the world to know about it, so they basically put him on ice,” Kanovitz said in a telephone interview. “If you’ve got unchecked power over the citizens, why not use it?”
The Obama administration has represented Rumsfeld through the Justice Department and argued that the former defense secretary cannot be sued personally for official conduct. The Justice Department also argued that a judge cannot review wartime decisions that are the constitutional responsibility of Congress and the president. And the department said the case could disclose sensitive information and distract from the war effort and that the threat of liability would impede future military decisions.
But U.S. District Judge James Gwin rejected those arguments and said U.S. citizens are protected by the Constitution at home or abroad during wartime.
“The court finds no convincing reason that United States citizens in Iraq should or must lose previously declared substantive due process protections during prolonged detention in a conflict zone abroad,” Gwin wrote in a ruling issued Tuesday.
“The stakes in holding detainees at Camp Cropper may have been high, but one purpose of the constitutional limitations on interrogation techniques and conditions of confinement even domestically is to strike a balance between government objectives and individual rights even when the stakes are high,” the judge ruled.
In many other cases brought by foreign detainees, judges have dismissed torture claims made against U.S. officials for their personal involvement in decisions over prisoner treatment. But this is the second time a federal judge has allowed U.S. citizens to sue Rumsfeld personally.
U.S. District Judge Wayne R. Andersen in Illinois last year said two other Americans who worked in Iraq as contractors and were held at Camp Cropper, Donald Vance and Nathan Ertel, can pursue claims that they were tortured using Rumsfeld-approved methods after they alleged illegal activities by their company. Rumsfeld is appealing that ruling, which Gwin cited.
The U.S. Supreme Court sets a high bar for suing high-ranking officials, requiring that they be tied directly to a violation of constitutional rights and must have clearly understood their actions crossed that line.
The case before Gwin involves a man who went to Iraq in December 2004 to work with an American-owned defense contracting firm. He was assigned as an Arabic translator for Marines gathering intelligence in Anbar. He says he was the first American to open direct talks with Abdul-Sattar Abu Risha, who became an important U.S. ally and later led a revolt of Sunni sheiks against al-Qaida before being killed by a bomb.
In November 2005, when he was to go on home leave, Navy Criminal Investigative Service agents questioned him about his work, refusing his requests for representation by his employer, the Marines or an attorney. The Justice Department says he was told he was suspected of helping provide classified information to the enemy and helping anti-coalition forces attempting to cross from Syria into Iraq.
Set to be released just before the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks by AE911Truth, this new documentary features cutting-edge 9/11 evidence from more than 50 experts in their fields – high-rise architects, structural engineers, physicists, chemical engineers, firefighters, metallurgists, explosives experts, controlled demolition technicians, and more. They are each highly qualified. Several have Ph.D’s, including renowned scientist, Lynn Margulis who was awarded the National Medal of Science.
Watch the Trailer:
In the full-length documentary AE911Truth also interviewed almost a dozen psychologists who will help us to explain why 9/11 Truth is so difficult for the public to even face, much less accept – and what we can do better to reach them. We will also hear from several 9/11 victim family members who support AE911Truth in their call for a new investigation.
“In this, his tenth book on 9/11 and its consequences, David Ray Griffin continues to report the facts and marshal the evidence that the mainstream media continue to ignore. Having previously demolished the official 9/11 story, Griffin now explains how the government got away with its crime against democracy.” - Paul Craig Roberts
Over 1,500 architects and engineers demand a new 9-11 investigation. Learn why in this worldwide acclaimed presentation with architect Richard Gage, AIA.